Health and Social Welfare Review Vol.31 No.4, pp.285-314
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to explore the feasibility of a basic income for Korea and Japan. To achieve this, the authors surveyed on the perception of 6 Korean researchers and 4 Japanese researchers by using AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process). We identified the difference of respondents’ perceived weight among the each elements and alternatives in the research model. The Korean researchers were found to view national political regime as the most important base for a basic income protection system. In particular, they supported collectivist-redistributionist policy. They also preferred a higher tax on interest, dividend, stocks etc, and thought that redistributive benefits should be provided in an amount equal to the minimum cost of living for all Korean residents. The Japanese researchers thought the determination of eligibility and the benefit level to be the most important element. The common factors running through both countries include residence-based universal entitlement and benefits equivalent to the national minimum cost of living. Based on these and other findings, the authors in this study discussed suggestions and policy implications for the development of basic income protection.
Table Of Contents
Ⅰ. 서론 Ⅱ. 기본소득의 다양성과 쟁점 Ⅲ. 한일 기본소득 구상의 전개 Ⅳ. 연구 방법 Ⅴ. 연구결과 Ⅵ. 결론 및 제언 참고문헌