Publications

Systematic Review on the Evaluation Research of Drug Utilization Review (DUR)

Title
Systematic Review on the Evaluation Research of Drug Utilization Review (DUR)
Alternative Author(s)

Kim, Jinyi ; Hong, Ji-Yoon ; Son, Heejung ; Shin, Young-jeon

Keyword
Drug Utilization Review ; DUR ; Systematic Review ; Policy Evaluation
Publication Year
2022-06-30
Publisher
Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs
Citation
Health and Social Welfare Review Vol.42 No.2, pp.158-178
Abstract
The Drug Utilization Review (DUR) has been operating nationwide since 2010. Although some DUR related studies and policy evaluations have been conducted, it is necessary to evaluate DUR comprehensively. This study systematically reviewed the existing domestic DUR evaluation studies. 31 articles were selected by searching documents published up to March 2021.
The first DUR evaluation article in Korea was a study on the perception of DUR in 2009. The number of studies increased until 2018 after the system was implemented. There were a survey (2019) and a study (2020) seeking to add a feedback function of DUR. The existing DUR evaluation article was 21 positive (58.3%) and 15 negative (41.7%). There were 21 articles for effectiveness (58.3%), 6 articles for satisfaction (16.7%), 5 articles for feedback (13.9%), and 4 articles for convenience (11.1%) in order. In the effectiveness section, there were 18 positive articles (85.7%) and 3 negative articles (14.3%). In the satisfaction study, doctors and pharmacists regarded DUR as positive for its effectiveness (50%), but the demand for improved convenience and feedback was high (50%). In the feedback study, all 5 studies (100%) were evaluated negatively. All 4 studies (100%) in the convenience section were evaluated negatively.
Through a systematic analysis of the existing DUR evaluation research, the currently implemented DUR policy is evaluated positively in the utility area, but policy improvement is needed in the convenience and feedback areas due to negative evaluation. In the future, conducting DUR effectiveness evaluation through patient health outcome research, improving the quality of DUR criteria items, improving feedback through the use of DUR monitoring, and improving the convenience of DUR alarm grading can increase the effectiveness of DUR policy. In the future, conducting DUR utility evaluation through patient health outcome research, improving the quality of inspection criteria items, improving reflux through the use of DUR monitoring, and improving the convenience of DUR alarm grading can increase the impact of DUR policy.
ISSN
1226-072X
KIHASA Research
Subject Classification
Health care > Food/Drugs
Show simple item record

File Download

share

qrcode
share
Cited 0 time in

아이템 조회 수, 다운로드 수

Loading...

라이선스

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.