The Impact of Having a Usual Source of Care on Healthcare Expenditure Among Patients with Chronic Musculoskeletal Disorders

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of having a Usual Source of Care (USC) on medical expenditures among patients with chronic musculoskeletal disorders, with a focus on strengthening primary care. Using data from the Korea Health Panel (2019–2021), we applied a linear mixed model with fixed effects to analyze adult patients diagnosed with chronic musculoskeletal conditions. The analysis revealed that individuals who had both a usual care institution and physician incurred higher annual medical expenditures compared to those without a USC. However, those who had both an institution and a physician showed lower per-visit outpatient costs than those with only an institution. Notably, the cost-reducing effect on outpatient visits was most pronounced among patients in poor self-rated health with multiple chronic conditions. Conversely, among Medicaid beneficiaries, annual medical expenditures increased more substantially with USC, suggesting improved access to care for medically underserved populations. These findings indicate that having a USC can play a crucial role in enhancing the function of primary care. A USC may enable patients to receive continuous and comprehensive care, maintain their health more effectively, and reduce unnecessary or emergency service utilization, thereby contributing to more efficient healthcare spending. By focusing on chronic musculoskeletal disorders, this study provides empirical evidence on the effectiveness of USC and offers policy implications for developing primary care-based chronic disease management systems in Korea.