A Comparative Analysis of Home Care Systems in South Korea, the United States, Australia, and Japan: From the Perspective of Respecting the Elderly’s Right to Self-Determination

Abstract

This study examines whether older adults' self-determination right is respected in their use of care services. It aims to identify issues in the Home Care System of Long-Term Care Insurance, suggest improvements, and guide future policies. Using Gilbert & Terrell’s framework, we compared home care systems in South Korea, the United States, Australia, and Japan. The comparative analysis showed that, unlike in other countries, older adults in South Korea's Home Care System had difficulty participating in service delivery and making meaningful choices. Moreover, the system lacked adequate support for those with limited decision-making capacity to make informed choices. In contrast, the United States, Australia, and Japan have systems that empower older adults to participate actively in service delivery and make their own choices. Additionally, the United States and Australia have widely implemented decision-making support systems. Furthermore, these countries have made efforts to respect older adults’ right to self-determination in the service delivery process by implementing self-directed care programs. These findings highlight the need for stronger mechanisms to empower older adults in service delivery and decision-making within the Home Care System of Long-Term Care Insurance. Policies should also strengthen mechanisms for older adults to exercise their right to self-determination in home care services and promote decision-making support in care settings.