Publications

A Simulation Analysis of the Effects of Proposed Changes to the National Basic Livelihood Security System

Full metadata record

DC Field Value
dc.contributor.authorLee, Wonjin
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-02T03:50:22Z
dc.date.available2025-07-02T03:50:22Z
dc.date.issued2025-07-02
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.kihasa.re.kr/handle/201002/47674
dc.description.abstractIn this study, we simulate the effects of several key modifications currently proposed for the National Basic Livelihood Security system (NBLS), using data from the Household Finances and Living Conditions Survey (HFLCS). The simulation analysis indicates that these changes—reducing the discrepancy between the standard median income and the actual median income derived from the HFLCS, raising the eligibility ceilings for Livelihood Allowance, increasing the basic deduction on earned and business income, and easing asset criteria—broaden NBLS coverage and reduce poverty. However, raising the eligibility limit for the Housing Allowance has little effect on poverty reduction, as it works to the benefit primarily of low-income individuals who are not in absolute poverty. Further discussion is needed on rationalizing the standard median income, relaxing asset criteria, and redefining the roles of the Livelihood, Housing, and Education Allowances.
dc.description.abstractIn this study, we simulate the effects of several key modifications currently proposed for the National Basic Livelihood Security system (NBLS), using data from the Household Finances and Living Conditions Survey (HFLCS). The simulation analysis indicates that these changes—reducing the discrepancy between the standard median income and the actual median income derived from the HFLCS, raising the eligibility ceilings for Livelihood Allowance, increasing the basic deduction on earned and business income, and easing asset criteria—broaden NBLS coverage and reduce poverty. However, raising the eligibility limit for the Housing Allowance has little effect on poverty reduction, as it works to the benefit primarily of low-income individuals who are not in absolute poverty. Further discussion is needed on rationalizing the standard median income, relaxing asset criteria, and redefining the roles of the Livelihood, Housing, and Education Allowances.
dc.formatimage/jpeg
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.format.extent15
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherKorea Institute for Health and Social Affairs
dc.titleA Simulation Analysis of the Effects of Proposed Changes to the National Basic Livelihood Security System
dc.typeArticle
dc.type.localArticle(Series)
dc.description.eprintVersionpublished
dc.citation.titleResearch in Brief
dc.citation.volume127
dc.citation.date2025-07-02
dc.citation.startPage1
dc.citation.endPage15
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationResearch in Brief, vol. 127, pp. 1 - 15
dc.date.dateaccepted2025-07-02T03:50:22Z
dc.date.datesubmitted2025-07-02T03:50:22Z
dc.subject.kihasa소득보장 일반
dc.subject.kihasa공공부조
KIHASA Research
Subject Classification
Income protection > General income protection
Income protection > Public income assistance
Show simple item record

File Download

share

qrcode
share
Cited 0 time in

Item view & Downlod Count

Loading...

License

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.