The Flexibility in the labour market has brought about many problems in the welfare system. It is very important for the welfare system to respond to this situation. In order to investigate the policy possibilities for Korea this study has inquired into the experiences of the advanced welfare states according to welfare state types and leads to the following results. Firstly, there are Anglo-Saxon countries that has the almost unlimited flexible labour market and the very limited welfare response to that. Secondly, there are two kinds of flexicurities, that is flexibility in the labour market combinated with security. The one can be called as the regulated flexicurity that can be found in Sweden. In this case the labour market has the flexibility but is regulated. The other can be called as the unregulated flexicurity that can be found in Netherlands and Denmark. In this case the labour market has the flexibility without almost no regulation. Thirdly, there are two kinds of dualization in the labour market. The one is the flexible dualization in the case of Germany. In Germany the core group of workers is well protected and others are not. But the mobility between two groups is not constrained by the rigid institution. And the weaker group in the labor market is protected by the welfare system like family service or social assistance. The other is the rigid dualization in the case of Japan. In Japan the regular workers of the organized labor union in the large enterprises are well protected and the others are not. And the weaker group is not so well protected by the welfare system. Fourthly, the economic performance of the flexicurity and the flexible dualization countries is better than the other countries. Korean labour market is dualized and the weaker group has not sufficient protection of the welfare system like Japan. Therefore it could be the first choice for Korea that the course of the flexible dualization with welfare protection for the weaker workers is taken.
Table Of Contents
Abstract 1 요약 3 제1장 서론 13 제1절 연구의 필요성 및 목적 13 제2절 연구내용 및 연구방법 14 제2장 제도간의 상보성의 관점에서 본 노동시장과 복지시스템 17 제1절 제도간 상보성에 관한 일반이론 17 제2절 노동시장과 복지시스템 간의 상보성 : 노동시장 유연성 19 제3장 복지선진국에서의 노동시장 유연성 제도와 복지시스템의 대응 33 제1절 복지국가 유형에 따른 대표적 복지국가 선정 33 제2절 덴마크 사례(윤진호 인하대 교수) 34 제3절 네덜란드 사례(권순미 고대 평화와 민주주의 연구소) 86 제4절 스웨덴 사례(강지원 한국보건사회연구원 연구원) 125 제5절 독일 사례(유근춘 한국보건사회연구원 연구위원) 159 제6절 영국 사례(임완섭 한국보건사회연구원 전문연구원) 176 제7절 일본 사례(권순미 고대 평화와 민주주의연구소) 204 제4장 결론과 우리나라에의 시사점 251 제1절 요약과 결론 251 제2절 우리나라에 대한 시사점 322 제3절 연구의 제한점 324 참고문헌 325
Local ID
Research Monographs 2012-25
ISBN
978-89-8187-953-2
KIHASA Research Subject Classification
General social security > Social security financing