한국사회 양극화 진단과 사회정책 대응 = A Study on the Diagnosis of Korean Social Polarization and Response to Social Policy
| DC Field | Value |
|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | 김태완 |
| dc.contributor.author | 이주미 |
| dc.contributor.author | 김기태 |
| dc.contributor.author | 임완섭 |
| dc.contributor.author | 송치호 |
| dc.contributor.author | 김명중 |
| dc.contributor.author | 김영미 |
| dc.coverage.temporal | 2022-01-01 - 2022-12-31 |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-03-29T01:31:22Z |
| dc.date.available | 2023-03-29T01:31:22Z |
| dc.date.issued | 2022 |
| dc.identifier.isbn | 9788968278853 |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://repository.kihasa.re.kr/handle/201002/42323 |
| dc.description.abstract | 양극화는 사회통합과 사회의 지속가능성을 낮추는 주요 원인으로 작동할 수 있다. 우리 연구는 양극화 현상을 횡단적, 종단적으로 분석하여 양극화 현상이 사회에 미칠 수 있는 영향을 파악하였다. 특히 소득, 자산, 노동시장, 사회참여 측면의 양극화 현상과 고령화 현상 같은 미래 양극화 현상에 대해 살펴보았다. 이 연구를 통해 발견된 두 가지 지점은 양극화 현상에 더해 격차가 더 진행되고 있다는 점과 시장에서 발생하는 격차가 정부개입 이후에 줄어드는 점이었다. 이러한 연구결과를 토대로 양극화 해소를 위해 시장을 통한 대처 방안과 사회안전망 강화 방안에 대해 논의하였다. |
| dc.description.abstract | This study analyzed the impact that polarization can have on society by grasping the polarization phenomenon cross-sectionally and longitudinally. Polarization means economic polarization, that is, polarization of income in a narrow concept, but polarization as a whole including income polarization in a broad concept (confrontation of political values between social groups due to disparities between groups in the economy and society as a whole, differentiation of lifestyles, relative increased sense of deprivation, etc.). In terms of income polarization, the polarization of market income has recently been intensifying, but has tended to be alleviated in terms of disposable income through public intervention. The market income gap still exists. Since 2017, the Gini coefficient of wealth has increased in both total and net assets. 1.7% of households living in the metropolitan area and 0.3% of households living in non-metropolitan areas were in the top 1% in net worth. When expanded to the top 5%, 7.8% of households residing in the metropolitan area and 2.3% of households residing in non-metropolitan areas belonged to it. As for the wage level of college graduates compared to middle school graduates (skilled workers versus unskilled workers), the difference in nominal amount between the wages of middle school graduates and below and the wages of college graduates and above has widened since 1980 at workplaces with 10 or more employees. The wage gap between regular and non-regular workers is widening, and the number of non-regular workers continues to increase. Nearly 90% of regular workers are enrolled in the national pension, while the participation rate of non-regular workers is only about 38%. The proportion of the elderly in the first quintile with low income reaches the mid-50% and is gradually increasing. Income mobility in the market is also not high for the elderly. There is not much room for improvement in the poverty of the elderly amidst the aging phenomenon in the future, so it is expected that the phenomenon of deepening and polarization of the elderly poverty will also appear. The two implications of this study were that the gap is progressing further in addition to the polarization phenomenon, and that the gap that occurs in the market is greatly reduced after the government intervention. In order to resolve the polarization, the principle of equal work and equal pay, and inequality and discriminatory matters must be corrected so that minorities and the socially vulnerable can participate in the labor market and society. Childcare and childrearing support policies that increase women's participation in economic activities and reduce the childcare burden of working women should be strengthened. Alternatives to narrowing the wage and welfare gap between conglomerates and SMEs must be presented. Finally, it is necessary to prepare policies to resolve the polarization and gap that will occur in the future society. Adjust the national pension insurance premium as a measure to strengthen the social safety net, but the income replacement rate should also be strengthened to improve the elderly poverty rate. To narrow the income and wealth gap, the progressivity of income and assets must be strengthened. A multi-layered social safety net that considers the life cycle and life process should be established. |
| dc.description.tableOfContents | Abstract 1 요약 5 제1장 서론 13 제1절 연구의 필요성 및 목적 15 제2절 연구의 내용 및 방법 24 제3절 기대효과 및 연구의 한계 26 제2장 이론적 배경 및 인식변화 29 제1절 양극화에 관한 이론적 배경 31 제2절 양극화의 원인에 대한 논의 51 제3절 양극화 인식변화 68 제3장 주요 국가의 양극화 대응 전략 83 제1절 독일 85 제2절 미국 120 제3절 일본 151 제4장 양극화의 진단과 사회정책 평가 189 제1절 소득과 자산 191 제2절 노동: 임금근로자 부문 234 제3절 정치·사회 참여 257 제4절 교육격차와 다른 격차와의 관계 285 제5장 미래 사회의 변화와 양극화 303 제1절 인구구조 변화-고령화 305 제2절 가계부채와 양극화 321 제6장 결론 및 정책제언 335 제1절 주요 연구 결과 정리 337 제2절 정책제언 345 참고문헌 353 부록 375 |
| dc.format | image/jpeg |
| dc.format | application/pdf |
| dc.format.extent | 395 |
| dc.language | kor |
| dc.publisher | 한국보건사회연구원 |
| dc.publisher | Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs |
| dc.rights | KOGL BY-NC-ND |
| dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/kr/ |
| dc.rights.uri | https://www.kogl.or.kr/info/licenseType4.do |
| dc.title | 한국사회 양극화 진단과 사회정책 대응 |
| dc.title.alternative | A Study on the Diagnosis of Korean Social Polarization and Response to Social Policy |
| dc.type | Book |
| dc.type.local | Report |
| dc.subject.keyword | 양극화 |
| dc.subject.keyword | 격차 |
| dc.subject.keyword | 사회보장 |
| dc.subject.keyword | Polarization |
| dc.subject.keyword | Disparity(=Gap or Distance) |
| dc.subject.keyword | Social Security |
| dc.contributor.alternativeName | Kim, Taewan |
| dc.contributor.alternativeName | Lee, Ju-mi |
| dc.contributor.alternativeName | Kim, Ki-tae |
| dc.contributor.alternativeName | Lim, Wan-sub |
| dc.contributor.alternativeName | Song, Kitae |
| dc.contributor.alternativeName | Kim, Myungjung |
| dc.contributor.alternativeName | Kim, Youngmi |
| dc.type.other | 연구보고서 |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.23060/kihasa.a.2022.21 |
| dc.identifier.localId | 연구보고서 2022-21 |
| dc.identifier.localId | Research Monographs 2022-21 |
| dc.citation.date | 2022 |
| dc.date.dateaccepted | 2023-03-29T01:31:22Z |
| dc.date.datesubmitted | 2023-03-29T01:31:22Z |
| dc.type.research | 정책연구 |
| dc.type.nkis | 기본연구보고서 |
| dc.subject.nkisMain | J |
| dc.subject.nkisMiddle | J1 |
| dc.description.sponsorshipAwardNumber | P202200010_1_1 |
| dc.type.project | 기본연구과제 |
| dc.description.sponsorshipAwardTitle | [기본22-008-00]한국사회 양극화 진단과 사회정책 대응 |
| dc.subject.kihasa | 소득보장 일반 |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
