◈ 개인별 맞춤형 건강증진서비스정보를 활용한 지역 건강지표 개발 ◈ 국민건강증진종합계획(HP2020) 및 기존 건강증진통계 산출현황 분석 ◈ 보건소 및 보건지소 단위의 산출통계에 대한 정책담당자들의 의견수렴 ◈ 보건기관통합정보시스템을 활용한 지역단위건강지표 및 HP2020 목표지표 산출가능성 분석 ◈ 보건기관통합정보시스템을 이용한 지역단위 건강지표 개발 및 제공방안 ◈ 지속적인 건강증진지표 추이분석을 위한 관리방안 마련 ◈ 산출지표의 내부 및 대국민서비스 제공 활용방안 마련
This study is aimed at establishing ways to utilize the integrated PHIS(Public Health Information System) to better produce indicators of community-based self-care health management and health project performance, a linchpin in making the country’s health care more preventive. Started out in the mid-1980s as the Community Health Center Information System, PHIS today is applied to most health care institutions in the country (87 percent of all health care institutions and 74 percent of community health centers, as of February 2011). This study finds that PHIS can be used to produce some of the health indicators which were suggested to be an important part of the lifecycle-specific health management models that community health centers provide for different groups. Also, some of the health project performance indicators, which take account for a large part of Joint Evaluation Indicators (Ministry of Public Administration and Security) and national health care planning, can be produced from the same source. This study presents the following policy suggestions. First, the development of indicators of the performance of community-based health projects requires inter-ministerial efforts. Second, the health care indicators this study presented for individual self-care management are subject to further review in terms of their scoring and appropriateness. Third, for PHIS to play a key role as intended in producing community-specific health indicators, it needs to be connected and in network with other related systems. Fourth, the various indicators?health project performance indicators and other statistics?existing on PHIS should be reviewed extensively and in full for further improvement. Fifth, additional efforts need to take place to develop a set of indicators which can demonstrate community-specific health levels in a timely and prompt manner, and which therefore can justify policy support when necessary. Sixth, indicators of self-care health management and health project performance should be made accessible through a multiple number of channels including PHIS and the Public Portal (http://phi.mw.go.kr/portal/index.do).
요 약 3
제1장 서 론 17 제1절 연구추진배경 및 필요성 17 제2절 연구목적 및 범위 19 제3절 연구내용 및 방법 21